We are currently operating in the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and Sri Lanka — providing top-tier recruitment solutions across multiple industries.

Our Blog

Brokerage vs Manpower Supply: Which Licence Actually Suits Your Hire?
Information · July 14, 2026

Brokerage vs Manpower Supply: Which Licence Actually Suits Your Hire?

A Dubai contractor was three months into a facility project when he discovered the "manpower agency" supplying his cleaning crew had never sponsored a single worker. Every cleaner was legally sponsored under his own trade licence, because the agency only held a brokerage licence. He had been paying a monthly rate for a service he had, without realising it, been legally responsible for all along.

That mix-up is more common than it should be, because the two licence types sound similar and are often marketed as interchangeable. Brokerage vs manpower supply licence is not a technicality. It decides who legally employs the worker, who carries gratuity and visa obligations, and who is on the hook if something goes wrong. For guidance suited to your specific hiring need, see ReapHR's recruitment services for employers.

This guide breaks down what each licence actually means for the hiring company, when each model genuinely fits, and the specific questions that prevent the exact confusion the contractor above ran into.

Quick Answer

A brokerage licence means the agency introduces candidates whom you then sponsor directly, ending its role at placement. A manpower supply licence means the agency sponsors the worker itself and deploys them to you under a service contract, so the worker remains the agency's employee throughout. The choice determines who carries gratuity, WPS, and visa liability, not just who sends the invoice.

Two Different Employment Relationships, Not Two Versions of One Service

It is tempting to treat brokerage and manpower supply as pricing tiers of the same offering. They are not. Each licence creates a fundamentally different legal employment relationship, and MOHRE regulates them as separate activities with separate bank guarantee requirements.

The distinction traces back to how UAE labour law defines the employer of record. Only one entity can hold that role for a given worker at any time, and the licence type is what determines whether that entity is you or the agency. Everything downstream- gratuity, WPS, insurance, and the termination process- flows from that single structural fact.

Under a brokerage licence, the agency's role ends once you hire the candidate it introduced. From that point, the worker is your employee, sponsored under your own labour card, and every downstream obligation- salary, gratuity, insurance- sits with you. Under a manpower supply licence, the agency remains the legal employer for the full duration of the engagement, no matter how long the worker sits on your site.

Some agencies hold a combined licence covering both activities, which is worth asking about directly. A combined-licence agency can genuinely offer either model depending on the role, but that flexibility does not remove the need to confirm, in writing, which model applies to your specific engagement before any contract is signed.

Brokerage: You Sponsor, You Own Every Downstream Obligation

Brokerage suits the classic permanent hire. You pay a one-off placement fee, typically a percentage of first-year salary, and once that candidate accepts, they become your direct employee with a UAE labour contract in your company's name.

That means you take on gratuity accrual from day one, WPS salary processing, medical insurance, and full responsibility for termination procedures if the relationship does not work out. The agency has no further contractual role once the placement fee is paid, beyond whatever replacement guarantee was agreed in writing.

Manpower Supply: The Agency Sponsors, You Pay for Flexibility

Manpower supply flips every one of those obligations onto the agency. The worker is sponsored by the agency, appears on the agency's labour card, and is deployed to your site under a service contract rather than an employment contract with you directly.

You pay a monthly service charge per worker instead of a placement fee, and that rate bundles the agency's cost of sponsoring, insuring, and administering that worker, plus its margin. In exchange, you avoid gratuity accrual, direct WPS obligations, and the administrative overhead of managing visas for a workforce that may fluctuate in size from month to month.

 

Factor

Brokerage Licence

Manpower Supply Licence

Who sponsors the worker

Hiring company, after placement

Agency, throughout the engagement

Typical MOHRE bank guarantee

AED 300,000

AED 1,000,000

Who pays gratuity

Hiring company

Agency

Pricing structure

One-off placement fee

Monthly per-worker service charge

Company structure allowed

Mainland or free zone

Mainland only

Best suited for

Permanent, direct-report hires

Project-based or fluctuating headcount

 

What Happens When the Working Relationship Ends

Termination looks completely different under each model, and it is worth understanding before, not during, a difficult exit. Under brokerage, ending the relationship means going through the full UAE termination process yourself: notice period, gratuity settlement, visa cancellation, and final settlement, exactly as you would for any direct employee.

Under manpower supply, ending the relationship is closer to cancelling a service contract. You notify the agency, the worker is reassigned, or their sponsorship is handled by the agency, and gratuity settlement is the agency's obligation, not yours. This is often the single biggest practical reason companies choose manpower supply for roles they expect to be temporary or variable.

Free Zone Limitation: Why Some "Manpower Agencies" Are Actually Brokers

One structural fact trips up more employers than any pricing detail. MOHRE manpower supply licences are only issued to mainland companies. A free zone entity is legally permitted to operate brokerage, consultancy, or executive search activity, but it cannot sponsor and supply workers directly, regardless of what its marketing materials claim.

If an agency describing itself as a "manpower supplier" is registered in a free zone, ask directly whether it holds a mainland manpower supply licence through a separate entity, or whether it is actually brokering and expecting you to sponsor the workers yourself. That single question would have saved the contractor in this guide's opening months of confusion.

Cost Structure: Placement Fee vs Monthly Service Charge

Comparing a brokerage quote and a manpower supply quote as if they were the same number is a common budgeting mistake. A 15 percent placement fee on a single permanent hire is a one-time cost. A monthly manpower supply rate is a recurring cost that compounds over the life of the contract.

For a role you expect to keep for years, brokerage is almost always cheaper once amortised. For a role tied to a specific project, a seasonal spike, or a headcount you expect to flex up and down, manpower supply avoids the sunk cost of a placement fee for workers you may only need for a few months.

Both pricing structures carry 5 percent VAT, and both are generally deductible once corporate tax is filed correctly, so tax treatment alone does not favour one model. The real financial difference sits in cash flow: a placement fee is a single upfront hit, while a manpower supply charge is a predictable recurring line item, easier to budget against month to month.

Choosing the Right Model for Your Next Hire

Start with a simple question: do you want this person on your own payroll indefinitely, or do you need labour capacity without the sponsorship overhead? A direct report you expect to manage, promote, and retain long-term almost always points to brokerage.

Bulk or project-based roles, such as construction labour, cleaning crews, or seasonal warehouse staff, are where manpower supply earns its higher monthly rate. The agency absorbs the sponsorship burden and the administrative churn of onboarding and offboarding workers as project phases change.

A useful middle-ground test is headcount volatility. If you expect the number of people in a role to stay flat for the next two to three years, brokerage's upfront cost is easy to justify. If that number is likely to swing with contract wins, seasons, or project phases, the monthly flexibility of manpower supply is worth its recurring premium.

What to Confirm Before You Sign Either Contract

Whichever model an agency proposes, get the licence type and sponsorship arrangement stated explicitly in the contract, not just implied by the sales conversation. Ask to see the specific MOHRE licence category, not just a general trade licence, and confirm which bank guarantee tier it corresponds to through MOHRE's official portal.

It also helps to put the question in plain language rather than relying on legal terminology alone: ask directly, "Once this person starts, whose labour card are they on, yours or ours?" That single sentence cuts through most of the ambiguity that legal-sounding contract clauses can obscure, and a legitimate agency will answer it without hesitation.

Before signing anything, it is worth reviewing what to ask before you sign, and separately confirming how to verify MOHRE Permit 64, since the licence number itself should distinguish between brokerage and manpower supply activity on the agency's official paperwork.

There is one more factor worth weighing before deciding: Emiratisation quotas apply to direct headcount, not always to manpower-supplied labour depending on role classification, so companies close to their quota threshold sometimes lean toward manpower supply for supporting roles specifically to manage that calculation. This is worth reviewing alongside what agencies actually charge so the full cost picture, not just the licence structure, factors into the decision.

Match the Licence to the Shape of the Hire

Brokerage and manpower supply are not two flavours of the same recruitment service. They are two different legal employment structures, with different sponsors, different cost patterns, and different liability sitting on the hiring company's side of the contract.

Match the model to the actual shape of your hiring need, permanent versus project-based, rather than to whichever quote arrives first. Getting the sponsorship structure confirmed in writing before signing is what actually protects you if the working relationship does not go as planned.

 

Not Sure Which Model Fits Your Next Hire?

ReapHR can walk through the sponsorship structure and cost implications before you commit to either licence type.

 

Explore our recruitment services for employers, or have our team review your existing employment contracts to confirm exactly who is legally sponsoring your current workforce. If a vendor relationship already feels unclear, an independent HR audit is a fast way to check the whole arrangement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between a brokerage and a manpower supply licence?

A brokerage licence lets an agency introduce candidates whom the hiring company then sponsors directly, ending the agency's role at placement. A manpower supply licence lets the agency sponsor the worker itself and deploy them to the client under an ongoing service contract, so the worker stays the agency's employee throughout the engagement.

Who pays end-of-service gratuity under a manpower supply arrangement?

The manpower supply agency does, since it remains the legal employer and sponsor throughout the contract. Under a brokerage placement, that obligation sits with the hiring company from day one, because the worker is sponsored directly under the employer's own labour card once the agency's introduction fee is settled.

Can a free zone company legally operate a manpower supply licence?

No. MOHRE manpower supply licences are issued to mainland companies only. A free zone entity can operate brokerage, consultancy, or executive search activity, but if it claims to supply and sponsor workers directly, it is exceeding what its licence actually permits, regardless of how the service is marketed.

Which model works out cheaper for the hiring company long term?

It depends on duration and headcount. Brokerage suits a single permanent hire, since the one-off placement fee is cheaper than years of monthly service charges. Manpower supply suits fluctuating or project-based headcount, where avoiding direct sponsorship, gratuity accrual, and visa administration outweighs the ongoing monthly premium per worker.

What happens if I assumed brokerage but the agency was actually manpower supply?

The practical risk is discovering, months in, that workers you believed you sponsored directly are still on the agency's labour cards, or the reverse: workers you thought the agency employed are actually yours to sponsor. Confirming the licence type and sponsorship structure in writing before signing prevents this exact mismatch.